March 4, 2016

The Morning Heresy is your daily digest of news and links relevant to the secular and skeptic communities.      

When a future civilization — maybe of this planet, maybe not — asks, “Where did it all go wrong for the humans of the 21st century? How did they destroy themselves so suddenly,” the scholars will, as one, point to the Republican debate last night as the harbinger of the End of All Things. I’m guessing, anyway.

In case you haven’t overdosed on Trump yet, allow me. I have a whole slew of Trump stuff here:

Ben Radford examines how Trump makes use of conspiracy theories to win attention and misdirected trust, and the health and science news outlet STAT explores Trump’s role in hawking vitamin products based on bad science.

Giles Fraser in The Guardian says whatever “religion” it is that Trump represents, it ain’t what we usually think of:

America became its own church and eventually its own god. Which is why the only real atheism in America is to call into question the American dream – a dream often indistinguishable from capitalism and the celebration of winners. This is the god Trump worships. 

The Christian Post (which I should say has been pretty good and fair to us) pulls a Romney and makes an un-endorsement of Donald Trump (an “undorsement”?):

This is a critical time in American history and we call on all Christians to pray for personal repentance, divine forgiveness and spiritual awakening for our nation. It is not the time for Donald Trump.

Oh! Oh! Guess who is supporting Donald Trump! Like, publicly! Michael Shermer. Ron Lindsay said on Twitter, “So The Moral Arc apparently leads us to Trump. Who knew?” (And to which I responded: “Everyone, STEP AWAY FROM THE ARC.”)

Okay that’s enough Trump. On the other side of things, Michelle Boorstein looks at the yet-unrealized political influence of the Nones on the Democratic Party, and George Mason University’s Mark Rozell says that Nones will push the party further left:

It will make a profound change in American politics in the long run. Put up a candidate who challenges people’s right to love who they want and make decisions about their own lifestyles, and see what happens among the unaffiliated. A lot of other issues go to the back burner. 

Ophelia Benson has a new piece in the upcoming Free Inquiry where she really bores into the insanity of the relationship between Saudi Arabia and the U.S. and its allies:

Saudi Arabia’s standing as a valued ally of the United States and the United Kingdom seems indefensible. When the Saudi king paid a state visit to Britain in 2007, Queen Elizabeth II gave a welcoming speech at the state banquet in which she said, “We have shared values that stem from two great religious traditions based on Abrahamic faiths.” Shared values—like what, for instance? Treating women like prisoners? Stoning women to death for nonmarital sex? Sentencing liberals to a thousand lashes?

I say shared values are exactly what we don’t have, and I think we should stop pretending that we do.

Our new boss Robyn Blumner also pens an op-ed on the impact campaigns like Openly Secular can have on demolishing stereotypes and discrimination against nonbelievers. 

You know what else is important? Having a functioning Supreme Court. We have an action alert for you to contact your senators and tell them to do their damned jobs. 

At the Course of Reason blog, Oliverio Covarrubias of the University of Iowa discusses how his group’s Darwin Week has changed its focus:

We have shied away from the atheistic militancy of the old … Our campus events and discussions have also seemingly moved away from straight secularism and atheism and moved into more general topics such as politics, bioethics and other still pertinent issues that aren’t as directly connected with secularism. 

Good on Reps. Nadler, Conyers, Scott, and Cohen for asking the DOJ to rescind the 2007 Bush memo that allowed religious organizations that get public funds to discriminate in hiring. 

Researchers studying chimps in West Africa say they are seeing evidence of a kind of religious belief and religious rituals from the chimps. My immediate reaction: ಠ_ಠ 

NYT profiles Craig Ellis, a Christian who is working in Manhattan explicitly to preach to “nones.” 

The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom says India is not providing visas for religious freedom monitors

ladesh’s High Court has now heard arguments against the insertion into its constitution of Islam as the official state religion.

I have never heard of The Blab, some kind of video-interview-podcast thing, and CFI–Los Angeles’s Jim Underdown talks about skepticism.   

Cardinal Pell hasn’t come home yet, but he is meeting with victims of Catholic Church sexual assault. 

In New Zealand, you can now be officially married by a “ministeroni” from the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. 

The Tennessean reports on the coming “NaNoCon,” the Nashville Nones Convention

An assisted-suicide bill in Maryland is pulled due to a lack of support. 

Indiana’s House will be voting on a bill that would disallow abortions done due to the disability or gender of the fetus

In a letter to the editor of the Toronto Star about problems with Canada’s religious freedom office, Michael Brunet rebuts the concept of “aggressive secularism,” and gives CFI a shout-out:

I don’t understand the phrase “aggressive secularism” and I definitely don’t understand how it is contextualized with “religious extremism” (politicized or not) as a form of “religious persecution.” This is an Alice in Wonderland conflation that cannot be passed off.

Secularist organizations from the International Humanist and Ethical Union to our Canadian Secular Alliance and the Center for Inquiry (CFI) have repeatedly come out in favour of the individual’s right of freedom of religion (while arguing appropriately for the equal right to freedom from religion). 

Quote of the Day: 

Never expected to see this. Catholic priest Alexander Lucie-Smith writes in the UK’s Catholic Herald says that the prosecution of a man is Russia for expressing his atheism means that Pussy Riot had a good point:

If someone offends the sentiments of Orthodox believers, does it matter? Frankly, no. We simply cannot prosecute everyone who may offend us. We ought to grow thicker skins. … Indeed this prosecution reminds us just what it was that Pussy Riot were protesting about. 

* * *

Original image by Shutterstock

Linking to a story or webpage does not imply endorsement by Paul or CFI. Not every use of quotation marks is ironic or sarcastic, but it often is. 

Follow CFI on Twitter: @center4inquiry 

Got a tip for the Heresy? Send it to press(at)centerforinquiry.net! 

News items that mention political​ candidates are for informational purposes only and under no circumstances are to be interpreted as statements of endorsement or opposition to any political candidate. CFI is a nonpartisan nonprofit.  

The Morning Heresy: “I actually read it.” – Hemant Mehta