The Subtle Bunkum of FaithDecember 23, 2014
In today’s New York Times, David Brooks offers his obligatory annual column of holiday woo. In “The Subtle Sensations of Faith” he plumps for faith as a near-universal human experience. He depicts it as the response to genuine “glimmering experiences … of wonder and mystery,” “magical moments of wonder and clearest consciousness, which suggested a dimension of existence beyond the everyday.” Clearly, Brooks accepts without question that these are experiences of something genuine – that is to say, that there factually is “a dimension of existence beyond the everyday.” Sorry, Mr. Brooks, I don’t buy it.
The Article that Started It AllDecember 17, 2014
In my Dec/Jan Free Inquiry op-ed “Thirty Years Yule-Free” I mentioned my 1992 Secular Humanist Bulletin article, “Confessions of an Anti-Claus,” the inadvertent beginning of my personal war on Christmas. Apparently there are some readers out there who haven’t saved their Bulletins from 1992, who want to see that article — but it’s not archived anywhere online. Okay, if you’re terminally curious, here is a PDF scan of the article that started it all.
Legacy Atheist Bans in State Constitutions a Long Recognized ProblemDecember 8, 2014
Todd Stiefel and the Openly Secular project have announced a bold plan to lobby legislators to repeal unconstitutional “legacy” language in seven states’ constitutions that bars atheists from holding public office. It bespeaks the growing prominence of unbelievers and “nones” in public discourse that someone now imagines that these unenforceable, but repellent, constitutional provisions might finally be swept away. The unbelieving community has long recognized that these hateful provisions exist, and that they are problematic. What is new, and welcome, is the possibility that our community finally has the muscle to demand that something be done about them.
Secular Humanism: Not a ReligionNovember 10, 2014
Litigation always carries risk – first of all, the risk of losing one’s case, but also the risk that a court decision will bring unintended consequences. On October 30, 2014, the American Humanist Association had what may prove to be a similar experience. In American Humanist Association v. United States of America, a federal district court in Oregon ruled that a prisoner had a valid legal claim when he alleged that prison officials refused to authorize a humanist study group. So far, so good. However, in reaching this conclusion the court bizarrely ruled that secular humanism is a religion, when the nature of secular humanism was never even an issue in the case. Of course, the judge may have been persuaded to reach this conclusion because in its arguments to the court the AHA vigorously contended that humanism is a religion, and made no effort to distinguish its brand of humanism from secular humanism.
Of Gender, Language, and ClaritySeptember 2, 2014
FREE INQUIRY columnist Greta Christina wrote a great essay for her other column (over at THE HUMANIST) about issues associated with treating transgender people with respect. (No idea whether it’s online, but the column “Trans People and Basic Human Respect” is on pages 38-39 of the new September-October issue.) … At one point Christina writes that some transgender people “choose to be identified with the gendered pronouns ‘he’ and ‘she,’ while others prefer new gender-neutral pronouns like ‘zie’ and ‘hir’ or use ‘they’ as a singular pronoun.” I’m down with all of that except the last bit. Using “they” as a singular pronoun … strikes me as going one step too far, because it unnecessarily degrades the clarity of our language in regards to number.
Really, Mr. Friedman?August 6, 2014
Writing from Tel Aviv, New York Times columnist Thomas L. Friedman today surveyed the current Israeli-Gaza war and sighed, “More and more, this is becoming a religious conflict.” Becoming, Mr. Friedman? Really? The seemingly-perpetual crisis in the Middle East has been a religious conflict — not totally, but significantly (and often principally) since its beginnings. And all three Abrahamic faiths bear guilt, in my view.
For many U. S. Christians, It’s Still “Subdue the Earth”July 18, 2014
Rank-and-file Christians seem to be less concerned about the environment than other Americans — and also, less concerned than their pastors think they are.
The Dry Humor of Samuel AlitoJuly 1, 2014
Not since Mick Jagger promoted the upcoming Monty Python reunion concert by complaining about old stars from the 60s who just endlessly rehash their own stuff (OK, that was earlier this week) has anyone displayed mastery of dry British humor like U. S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, Jr.
Ingersoll Museum Renovation: Progress ReportMarch 18, 2014
It’s been a vicious winter; nonetheless progress continues toward the installation of the all-new T. M. Scruggs Museum Interior. Herewith, some progress photos.
A Classic Article on the Religious/Secular Humanist DivideFebruary 21, 2014
From time to time I’ll flag classic articles from back issues of FREE INQUIRY — pieces that are worth another read today if you keep your physical back issues. If you’re a current FI subscriber, you can also read the article online (link at bottom of this post).
From the Summer 2002 issue (Volume 22, No. 3), Bible scholar Robert M. Price limns the difference between religious and secular humanism about as elegantly as one can.