December 6, 2022
After reviewing fifty years of legend, rumor, and conspiracy theory research, a folklorist proposes a simple test to help someone quickly assess how much they should trust a story.
Free Article: Skeptical Inquirer January/February 2022
“The SLAP Test consists of four simple questions:
- Does the account attempt to scare or shock? If the answer is yes, be wary.
- Does the account rely on complicated or far-fetched logistics? If the answer is yes, be wary.
- Does the account involve A-listers—famous people, products, or events? If the answer is yes, be wary.
- Does the account demonstrate prejudice; that is, does it demonize or portray a person or group as “other”? If the answer is yes, be wary.”
Discussion:
- The author points out that skeptics can sometimes come across as too negative. Why do you think this is the case?
- The author is careful to point out that the SLAP test doesn’t stigmatize people’s beliefs, but encourages them to probe deeper and engage with their convictions. What are the merits of this approach?
- Can you identify any problems with the SLAP test?
- The author notes the availability of online resources, but of course, many people often fail to use them. How might we encourage people to make more use of trusted information sources? If these sources are freely available, what more can we do?
Group activity:
Have some well-documented conspiracy theories ready, and apply the SLAP test. The group can work through the theories together and apply each element of the SLAP test in order to gain familiarity with the mechanics.
This discussion guide was created by Kyle Sobon, Program Manager at CFI Western New York