You have to love the irony, don’t you? On the one hand you have the ID proponents demanding that we prove, definitively, in a way they won’t reject (which doesn’t exist) that evolution is scientifically viable. They’re pushing ID by demanding we prove its competition. On the other hand the people who don’t have a specific science to argue against telling us that they have nothing to prove. It’s almost as if the cards are always stacked against science by anyone with a hoakey belief system…but of course I can’t prove that scientifically when commanded to, nor can I produce the specific transitional fossil linking whales to cats or whatever weird thing randomly demanded, so it must not be true.